Knowing Our Truths to Practice Our Values
Thought for Contemplation: “History, despite its wrenching pain cannot be unlived, but if faced with courage, need not be lived again. “
*Maya Angelou
“Knowing Our Truths To Practice Our Values”
The Rev. Dr. Anita Farber-Robertson
First Parish in Cohasset
Readings from Why History Matters, by Richard Stengel
My German Grandmother made wonderful traditional German food. When I spent weekends at her house I looked forward to the chicken soup with a hint of the nutmeg she had freshly ground on her little spice grater, and to the cucumber salad with cucumbers sliced so thin they reminded me of the onion skin paper my mother used in her typewriter. I wondered how she did that-made the cucumber slices so thin. We would have sweet and sour red cabbage with bits of bacon in it, mushrooms in gravy, hot potato salad and a barbecued chicken she would get at the butcher shop, and then cut up and heat in a pot of gravy on the stove. I loved going with her to the butcher shop. It seemed exotic and old fashioned. There was saw dust on the floor that I could arrange into pictures with the toe of my shoe. The butcher also had some German products including candies – he often gave me one. So I assumed that barbecued chicken, cooked at the butcher’s on a rotisserie and reheated in gravy was a traditional German dish, along with the hot potato salad, red cabbage, chicken soup and paper thin cucumber salad.
It was not until I was an adult that I discovered that my grandmother’s oven didn’t work. She didn’t trust the landlord not to raise her rent if he fixed it, so she lived all those years preparing and eating only what she could cook on top of the stove.
Now if I want to make a traditional German dinner, I am released from having to buy a barbecue-rotisserie chicken and heating it in gravy. Which is great, because I really don’t like gravy! But had I never learned the circumstance within which all of my grandmother’s cooking took place, I too would have been bound by a perceived tradition, even though my oven works just fine.
A professor of mine in seminary told the story of a young man who had graduated and went on to serve a church not too far away in Connecticut. His was a successful ministry, but there was one point of contention that had continued between him and the congregation. When they had communion, instead of standing behind the table, as a host at a meal would when breaking the bread and pouring the wine, he would always stand in front of the table.
They complained because it was not what they were used to, and they complained because his back and his torso were blocking them from seeing what he was doing, which was an important part of the communion experience for them.
He was firm. He would continue to do it the way he had been taught in seminary. He explained to them that he was standing with his back to them because he was being respectful of God. That he was, with them facing the altar, placing himself fully within the congregation as one of them, true to the free church tradition which affirms the priesthood of all believers.
They listened, but they were not convinced. They chaffed. They complained. Eventually he called his professor of worship and liturgical arts.
“Tell me again,” he said, “why it is that we face the altar and turn our backs to the congregation when we are preparing communion. ”
“Oh, ” laughed the professor. “We do that here because one of the communion table legs broke several years ago and the table was very was unstable. We loved the table. No one wanted to remove it, and it didn’t look like it was the kind of break that could easily be repaired. So someone nailed the table to the floor to keep it stable. With it nailed to the floor, we couldn’t pull it out to stand behind it any more. So we had to stand in front of it.”
Many years ago in most congregations, and quite possibly this one, everyone went to Sunday School, and everyone went to worship. Often classes were held first and from that time of study, adults and children went to worship. There are some churches that still follow that pattern.
The pattern that most Unitarian Universalist congregations have developed is of a Sunday morning gathering in which children’s Sunday School is held at the same time as adult worship. Our wonderful church archivists have surfaced an annual report of the Church School to the congregation from 1956. By then church school and adult worship were distinctly separate and held at the same time.
The Religious Education program was designed to fit the same one hour time slot that the adults had also adopted. It was a plan of convenience that worked pretty well.
Then our congregations began to miss the children. And they became concerned that the children really did not know or feel comfortable in the worship space. So the idea came up of having the children in for part of the service. Some congregations do it every Sunday, some, like ours , every other Sunday. And most congregations have some form of worship for the children on the Sundays they are not with the adults, in addition to their classes.
But the people who write our curricula write for at least an hour of Sunday School class. And they feel squeezed, that there is not enough time to cover material in a meaningful way. What once was a system that served our purposes and was of mutual convenience is now a little out of synch. We chaff because we cannot fit everything we want to do in an hour of worship, and the teachers chaff because they cannot cover the material they want to share with the children. The practice we continue is not meeting our needs.
Remembering why we do the things we do, and the purposes they were intended to serve, allows us the capacity to decide when those habits and customs still serve us, and when they are missing the mark and need to be changed.
I once served as interim minister in a congregation that was much like this- a white, Anglo, liberal congregation. But it was located in a city that had experienced significant immigration and the church was now surrounded by a community that spoke a different language, had a different culture, and had different religious practices. The congregation was despairing. Were they destined to shrink until the funds were gone and the doors had to close?
When we engaged in an exploration of their history, I discovered, and they remembered, that about two generations before, their city had also known a great influx of immigrants. The immigrants were of a different religion, a different culture and spoke a different language. The newcomers struggled to find their way in this country, poor, isolated, often afraid and confused. This congregation I was serving, had, those many years ago established a mission church in the neighborhood of the immigrants. The church had initially provided the salary for a pastor who spoke the language of the immigrants. It supported him, and the fledging new congregation financially and with periodic joint activities, continuing education, ESL classes and other services. Over the generations the mission church thrived, then dwindled as the second generation Americans no longer needed it. They spoke English and the American culture was their culture.
Eventually the mission church was absorbed into the parent church. By the time I arrived this was history. Many of the leaders of the congregation could trace their roots back to that ethnic mission church.
So when the congregation said to me that they felt helpless in the face of the insurmountable obstacles of language, culture, custom and religion, and that maybe they were just going to die, I could not let that go unchallenged.
“Look,” I said. “You have faced this problem before. You rose to the challenge and addressed it. People who were strange and foreign two generations ago are now active members and leaders of your beloved community. You do know how to go out into this ethnic community learning their ways, their needs and their strengths. Become the kind of church you would like to encounter when your feet touch down on foreign soil. And they did.
Uncovering the story of why we do things the way we do can sometimes lead us to self-conscious discomfort, recognizing that we are being held hostage to a practice that no longer has a reason for being. Uncovering the story of what we have done and how we have managed our challenges can provide resources and encouragement as we ready ourselves to face the challenges of today.
Historian David McCullough says that being an American is not based on a common ancestry, a common religion, even a common culture- it’s based on accepting an uncommon set of ideas. And if we don’t understand those ideas, we don’t value them; and if we don’t value them, we don’t protect them. He reminds us of the words of Thomas Jefferson “A nation can never be ignorant and free.” So too, I say, of the church.
So what are the values that are the essence of Unitarian Universalism, the values our practices need to protect and serve?
Earle Morse Wilbur traces the development of Unitarianism through history. He distills the essence of Unitarianism as a commitment to freedom, reason and tolerance. These three cherished values and their practice through hundreds of years, have shaped us and the people of faith we have become.
If these values of freedom, reason and tolerance are important to you, as they are to me, they become a source of strength and support as we recognize that in our times of strength, these elements have been in play. When we have lost sight of them, we have often been faced with troubling consequences.
For example, during World War I the American Unitarian Association removed from Fellowship any minister who did not support the war effort. John Haynes Holmes, founder of the ACLU and co-founder of the NAACP was minister of the renowned Community Church in New York and a pacifist. In support of their minister, the Community Church withdrew from the American Unitarian Association. It was not until years later that the AUA expressed its regret and the Community Church rejoined our association. We get in trouble when we stray from our core values.
Another essential value in our tradition is that of inclusion, the essence of Universalism, which has thrust us out on the cutting edge of civil rights issues, from our work to abolish slavery, to our fighting for the rights of women, LGBT folks and immigrants.
It was the murder of James Reeb, Unitarian Universalist minister during the civil rights march in Selma, Alabama that outraged the nation and motivated President Lyndon Johnson to use all of his powers of influence to get the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed. Our values had driven hundreds of Unitarian Universalists to march, and ultimately, those values changed our nation.
Ours is a human institution, checkered indeed, with points of shining vision and courage, and times of fear narrow interests. We can claim it all, the pride and regret. Understanding then, who we truly are and from where we have come, we can imagine a future, choose a direction, and taking with us the resources we have uncovered, redeem the errors and create tomorrows- the tomorrows we want with wiser, kinder and braver ways, tomorrows in which all of us would want to live and thrive.

