“A Story That Heals”
Thought for Contemplation- ““What kind of a story heals? A story that is loving and true. True because nothing is left out, neither the pain nor the joy. Loving because everyone in the story – narrator, protagonist and characters alike, is seen with compassionate eyes.”
Margaret Bullitt-Jonas Holy Hunger
“A Story That Heals”
The Rev. Dr. Anita Farber-Robertson
First Parish in Cohasset
January 15, 2012
Reading: from Forgetting is Key to A Healthy Mind, by Ingrid Wickelgren
Attached at end
The Bible was not written for children.
It has lessons from which we all, children and adults alike, can benefit, but the Bible was not written for children.
That means that we chose how we exposure the children to it, the way we tell the stories and the messages we craft for them to remember. Developmental psychology tells us that children cannot take in meanings or messages beyond their capacities. Their developing brains screen out what does not make sense to them. Of course, they can always hear stories, biblical and otherwise that evoke confusion, disquiet or alarm. So we craft our biblical and other story telling to children in such a way as to help them hear the stories, the messages and the questions that are appropriate for them.
That is well and good.
But they grow up. If they have not been invited to re-engage the stories, all they know is what was offered to and received by them as children. The complexities; the nuances; the deep emotional challenges are missing, either because we did not tell them, or because at the age they were they could not hear them. And if the last time that we who sit here as adults heard those stories was when we were children, we are not working with the full deck. We left our biblical education at a certain developmental stage and have only that age view of the bible stories, maybe literal, maybe historical, maybe metaphorical, but certainly less complex and nuanced than we could perceive today with a world of life experience under our belts.
It had been awhile since I went back and read the full story of Jacob and Esau and I was shocked. Shocked by what I didn’t remember. Shocked by the kind of internal and emotional work I needed to do in order to engage the story in ways meaningful, respectful and profound.
In some ways it read like a bad soap opera. And I knew that characterizing it that way was not going to help me learn from it, and neither would it help me to help you.
Margaret Bullitt-Jonas offers exactly the right challenge.
“What kind of a story heals? A story that is loving and true. True because nothing is left out, neither the pain nor the joy. Loving because everyone in the story – narrator, protagonist and characters alike, is seen with compassionate eyes.”
Can we read the story, hear the story in that way? With compassionate eyes?
Isaac and Rebekah had two sons, fraternal twins, Esau the first born and Jacob, the second. Isaac loved Esau and Rebekah loved Jacob.
Esau grows up to be a hunter and Jacob a quiet man, who stays home in the tent. One day Esau comes back from hunting, tired and famished. Jacob is cooking lentil stew. Esau asks for some, saying that he is famished. Jacob offers to give him something to eat in exchange for Esau’s birth right. Esau, painfully hunger and tired says” “I am about to die; of what use is a birthright to me?” And he agrees to the deal.
There is a famine in the land. They move to Gerar. Because Rebekah is very beautiful, Isaac worries that they might kill him to take Rebekah. So he says that Rebekah is his sister. He is seen fondling Rebekah and is confronted about such behavior with a sister. He confesses that she is his wife. The King, Abimelech takes pity on him and promises him protection.
Isaac prospers- generating envy. Fast as he digs wells for his flocks, they fill them up with earth. Finally he gives up and they move to Beer-sheba. Isaac grows old and blind. Perceiving death’s coming, he asks Esau to go hunt game for him, prepare a savory meal and bring it to his old father. He will then enjoy the food Isaac had caught and prepared and will in turn bestow his blessing on his son.
Rebekah, who loves Jacob best, overhears this and runs to tell Jacob to kill two choice kids. She will prepare the savory meal just as Isaac likes it. She tells Jacob to put on Esau’s clothes so that he will smell like Esau to the blind father, and she puts animal skins on his hands and arms and neck to disguise his smooth skin, so that Isaac will feel it, and knowing that Esau is a hairy man, think it is Esau.
Jacob does all this. When his father asks who it is that is bringing him this meal, he says it is Esau. Isaac is suspicious, aware that the voice sounds like that of Jacob, so Jacob lets him feel his hairy hand and smell him. Finally convinced, he gives Jacob his blessing, believing he is blessing Esau. When Esau returns with the game, prepares the meal and bring it to his father it is too late. ‘If this is you, Esau. Who was that to whom I gave my blessing?’ It was Jacob; but he tells Esau he cannot undo it.
Esau, after crying out in anguish swears revenge. When his father is dead, he will kill Jacob. Rebekah hears this and warns Jacob to leave, to go live with her brother Laban in another land, which he does.
So the two brothers each go off to seek their fortune and create their own life- Jacob with the inheritance and blessing out of which he has swindled Esau, and Esau, starting out from scratch.
There is so much about this story that is troubling. It is filled with deceit, manipulation and self-serving behaviors. It is hardly what we thought we‘d encounter from our esteemed forebears.
And the challenge of Margaret Bullitt-Jonas rings clear:
“What kind of a story heals? A story that is loving and true. True because nothing is left out, neither the pain nor the joy. Loving because everyone in the story – narrator, protagonist and characters alike, is seen with compassionate eyes.”
I realize she is right. The narrator of this story is dispassionate. The whole truth is told, the joy and the pain, the love and the hurt. None of the characters are judged, but rather told from their own point of view, compassionate. Could we do that?
My first response was to feel compassion for Esau, even if he was foolish enough to sell his birthright for a bowl of lentils. And compassion for Isaac who was tricked.
But we know that Isaac sometimes felt justified in deception himself, saying Rebekah was his sister. And we know that he was as responsible as was Rebekah for that dysfunctional family dynamic. Ahhh, every character has faults.
This then is a family story of betrayals and selfishness. Why are we reading it? Why should we know it?
The answer came to me almost as soon as the question. Because it is true. Historically factual? I have no idea. But I know it is true. Because we are each victims of deceit and betrayal. Because we are each at some times deceivers or betrayers. I don’t like it. I don’t like to be pushed to find compassion in my heart for deceivers and betrayers. I don’t like it because when I really open up and emotionally embrace them with compassion, I realize that it is my own self I am embracing, the self I deny, ignore, forget. The self that lied, manipulated, finagled to get what I wanted, or believed that I need. The frightened child who fears the loss of parental love and abandonment and holds a sibling responsible. The frightened adult who lives with the haunting fear that they are not accepted or acceptable, who will do anything, or almost anything to discredit one who might have the power to shut us out.
Sibling rivalry. It is as old as humanity. As deep as any terror about survival. We struggle with it in our families. And we struggle with it amongst the nations and within our nation.
Monday is Martin Luther King, Jr. Day. The civil rights movement was a recap of the liberating journey stories, not only the Exodus, but this earlier story. Our nation was started by white folks who believed that they were God’s chosen, their kind had received the blessing. Race, white or not-white, was an indicator to them of God’s blessing or disfavor.
But there are biblical stories that challenge that. In the Genesis stories of Adam and Eve, and of Noah, we are presented again and again with the biblical assertion that we are all descended from the same gene pool. Five thousand years later we have DNA evidence that this is factually true as well as existentially true.
The resistance to knowing this runs deep. It is easier to divide the world into good guys and bad guys, them and us.
Racism is a toxic legacy we have inherited from the self-serving mis-understandings of our biblical heritage.
It is the depth of the anguish of sibling rivalry and the fear of being shut out or left out, that is often the existential anxiety that motivates all kinds of aggression, from bullying in the playground, to manipulations by Wall Street…the fear that ultimately there will not be enough resources to go around, and the only way to assure survival is to hog and hoard them.
It is why I am a Universalist. Any other world is too scary for me. Presses me into attitudes and behaviors I find not only painful, but abhorrent. I need to believe that everyone who is born into this world belongs here. That no one needs to justify their right to exist. That there is enough love in the universe to hold everyone, everyone, even you…even me.
So Jacob and Esau each made their own lives and discovered that their well being does not need to be predicated on the other’s demise. They learn; they develop their own identity, their own relationship with God. And they begin to feel the weight of the loss of one another. Instead of anger, they feel longing, longing for healing, for reconciliation, for repair of the bond they once knew as brothers. They long to feel the love of family cleansed of the toxic jealousies.
…Esau ran to meet Jacob and embraced him; he threw his arms around his neck and kissed him. And they wept. Then Esau looked up and saw the women and children. “Who are these with you?” he asked.
Jacob answered, “They are the children God has graciously given your servant.”…
Esau asked, “What’s the meaning of all these flocks and herds I met?”
“To find favor in your eyes, my lord,” he said.
But Esau said, “I already have plenty, my brother. Keep what you have for yourself.”
“No, please!” said Jacob. “If I have found favor in your eyes, accept this gift from me. For to see your face is like seeing the face of God, now that you have received me favorably. Please accept the present that was brought to you, for God has been gracious to me and I have all I need.” And because Jacob insisted, Esau accepted it.
Then Esau said, “Let us be on our way; I’ll accompany you.”
Studies tell us that there is such a thing as healthy forgetting. That people who are resilient, who are able to live in the present with a hopeful eye to the future know what is worth remembering, and what to forget. Forgiveness comes easier. Their burdens are less. What is the point of holding on to that which cannot be changed? Why step back from the joy of love, because once it was lost?
This family’s journey took them through difficult times. They came through in tact, the rupture repaired, their hearts healed. We can too.
We can forgive others and we can forgive ourselves. When we let go and forget, we are free to risk and to love. Finding peace, peace at last, we offer it to others and begin to heal our world. Amen.
Forgetting is Key to a Healthy Mind
By Ingrid Wickelgren | Friday, December 23, 2011, Scientific American | Excerpted
…. (According to)
cognitive neuroscientist Benjamin J. Levy . “The problem with our memories is not that nothing comes to mind—but that irrelevant stuff comes to mind.”
The act of forgetting crafts and hones data in the brain…. It enables us to make sense of the world by clearing a path to the thoughts that are truly valuable. It also aids emotional recovery. “You want to forget embarrassing things,… “Or if you argue with your partner, you want to move on.”…
In recent years researchers have amassed evidence for our ability to willfully forget. They have sketched out a neural circuit underlying this skill…
The emerging data provide the first scientific support for Sigmund Freud’s controversial theory of repression, by which unwanted memories are shoved into the subconscious. The new evidence suggests that the ability to repress is quite useful. Those who cannot do this well tend to let thoughts stick in their mind. They ruminate, which can pave a path to depression. Weak restraints on memory may similarly impede the emotional recovery of trauma victims. …
The ability to forget, however, is not immutable. If you practice applying your mental brakes, unwanted memories tend to fade.
…
For most people, the concept of forgetting conjures up lost car keys, missed appointments and poor scores on exams. Worse, it augurs dementia. Psychologists traditionally shared this view, and most of them studied memory with an eye toward closing the cracks through which knowledge can slip…. In the early 1900s Freud proposed that people tend to block out negative recollections as a defense mechanism…. individuals need to revisit these memories to promote psychological recovery.
An early challenge to that downbeat view of forgetting emerged in 1970, when psychologist Robert A. Bjork, …reported that instructions to forget some learned items could enhance memory for others. Forgetting is therefore not a sign of an inferior intellect—but quite the opposite. The purpose of forgetting, he wrote, is to prevent thoughts no longer needed from interfering with the handling of current information—akin to ridding your home of extraneous objects so that you can find what you need. “When people voice complaints about their memory, they invariably assume that the problem is one of insufficient retention of information,” Bjork wrote. “In a very real sense, however, the problem may be at least partly a matter of insufficient or inefficient forgetting.”
…For the average person, the ability to forget goes up and down over the years just as executive function does. … memory suppression improves between age eight and 12, when it approaches the level … in young adults. At the end of life, forgetting again becomes more difficult. In a study published in 2011 …elderly adults had more trouble than those aged 18 to 25 keeping an experience out of consciousness when reminded of it. “Kids and older adults have a hard time getting rid of this stuff,” …As a result… both age groups may have particular problems recovering from unpleasantness in life.
© 2012 Scientific American, a Division of Nature America, Inc. View Mobile Site All Rights Reserved.


